Should the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge be open to oil drilling Research Paper

Should the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge be open to inunct oil production - Research Paper ExampleEnvironmentalists and other interest groups nevertheless argue that allowing oil drilling in the region would endanger the wildlife in the region, disrupting their reproductive cycles, their communication, and their endangering their lives. Advocates for oil exploration in the region however insist that the impact of oil drilling in the region on the wildlife would be minimal at best. Opponents to the drilling are not convinced of such contention. Hence, much contr all oversy in this issue is apparent. This write up shall explore this issue and establish a clear and comprehensive sermon on the topic. It shall draw its discussion based on information gathered from scholarly materials and compare it with newspaper and materials from the print media. The discussions in two types of sources shall be analyzed and assessed based on reliability and their applicability to this subject mat ter. These sources shall serve as both(prenominal) informal and formal scholarly sources for this issue, establishing clear support for the topic based on clearly specify and clearly identified arguments from well-supported write-ups. Side A Oil drilling should not be allowed in the ANWR pedantic articles are also polarized on the issue with studies discussing the environmental and others the economic aspect of the issue. In a take away by Brown (2005), the author discussed the value of the wilderness which is protected by the ANWR. The author further argued the grandeur of maintaining the surface area as a wilderness an area which must be unexplored and untrammeled by humans (Brown, 2005). These environmentalists are firm in expressing that allowing oil exploration in the ANWR would ruin its pristine specification because human activities would blemish the landscape. The US Congress has even acknowledged the fact that beauty is in slice the glory of seeing moose, caribou, and wolves living in natural habitat, untouched by civilization (as cited by Brown, 2005). versatile studies on environmental positions on the issue set forth that preservation is a priority over any other considerations, and that lands which have been set apart from human exploration must be preserve as such. Most Americans seem to agree with this stance because surveys throughout the years indicate that majority of them do not support drilling in the ANWR. A paper by Kaye (2005) also sets forth similar positions by environmentalists on the issue. This paper also discussed the importance of preserving the ANWR as a wildlife refuge. This study points out that the ANWR provides sanctuaries and benefits which cannot be seen in any other region in the world. They describe it as a place to figure restraint. It therefore implies that human activities must be fiercely restrained and restricted in this area because it represents the creator which people seem to have over the area a p ower which must be held clog up and controlled to a certain extent (Kaye, 2005). In effect, these studies point out the importance of controlling human activities, allowing it to be carried out elsewhere, but to be avoided in this region which has for millions of years been allowed to flourish and to exist as an area untouched by human hands. Other scholarly articles discuss how government officials are clearly recognizing the need for the US to explore its domestic sources of oil, and therefore the need for the